this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2024
921 points (99.1% liked)

Science Memes

10885 readers
5478 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
921
#goals (mander.xyz)
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
22 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

My worst review said that my paper was technically sound but my entire specialty was a "cottage industry" generating computational models with no real-world relevance and therefore the paper should be rejected. The editor offered the opportunity to rebut but what could I say to something like that?

(The reviewer still lives, as far as I know.)

On the plus side, this meant that I was rejected by PNAS but then published in BJ.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago

Ahh...

PNAS (say it out loud)

and

BJ

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

"Citations please."