News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
I mean, you're entitled to your opinion as to his performance, but that definitely isn't what I found less-appealing. Like, he spent a lot of time with the vomiting clips that were pretty much zero-content in terms of what people he was talking about actually did. I think that the entire section complaining about Dick Cheney was...I mean, it wasn't highlighting anything that Cheney did in the endorsement that was actually unreasonable. Complaining about a Cheney endorsement of Harris seems pretty off-the-mark to me; if anything, I'd have imagined that he'd have rather had people endorse Harris. The Dershowitz thing was...okay, yeah, that might be a little like some of the stuff he used to do, as he was highlighting a statement that could be seen as kind of unreasonable and why, though Dershowitz is kind of not a very important figure.
The bits I liked the most were actually critiquing statements made during the debate that didn't hold up. I felt that he was pretty light on that compared to potential content, but I'll give him that he didn't have much time, and the bit at the end where I think that he made a pretty heartfelt statement which was not at all vintage Stewart but at least brought some kind of discussable insight to the table.
I don't want to have Stewart acting more-strongly partisan; in fact, he was prominently complaining about people doing so in the media at one point in the past, pointing out that stuff like that Tucker Carlson's show really didn't warrant being considered news.
What I really liked in the past was him pointing out incorrect statements and inconsistent positions, but doing so in an appealing-to-watch format; most people aren't likely going to just watch someone just do a string of fact-checking in political statements being made during the past couple days, and he would present it in a format that people could enjoy.
I'd be fine with him hitting both Republican and Democratic politicians about the same amount, would prefer it if anything, though I've got no idea whether that's as commercially-viable.
I also don't think that his trademark long pauses, facial expressions, and doodling stuff were as funny as in the past though...eh, that was always filler content anyway. I mean, that wasn't what I was going to watch the show for. But I do remember chuckling before when he got the timing spot-on and had a delayed grin or something, and I didn't do that this time.