this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
255 points (97.8% liked)

RetroGaming

19787 readers
109 users here now

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Introducing Dungeons of Infinity

A talented individual known as Justin Bohemier has transformed the classic Super Nintendo hit, A Link to the Past, into a procedurally-generated roguelike dungeon crawler. Over four years in development using Gamemaker Studio with the original assets, the game 'Dungeons of Infinity' aims to offer a new and challenging experience for fans.

Key Features:

  • Procedural Generation - Each playthrough offers unique layouts, enemies, and items.
  • Link's Nemesis Aghanim - The ultimate challenge lies in encountering Link's arch-enemy, Aghanim. Survival depends on navigating the dungeons until reaching this final boss.

The creator emphasizes that no continues or extra lives are available, adding to the game’s difficulty curve.


What do you think about applying roguelike elements to classic games like 'A Link to the Past'? Have you encountered similar fan projects?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I know it's common, fun and morally correct to dunk on Nintendo, but they need to "defend their IP", if they don't want to lose their trademark on it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Copyrights (rights to media content) do not lapse because of failure to enforce them.

Trademarks (the right to call your product a specific name) can lapse if members of the general public start associating it with a type of product rather than your specific brand. This happened with "zipper", "jet ski", and "popsicle". But you can't sue Grandma Smith because she mistakingly referred to an Xbox as "a Nintendo".

[–] [email protected] -4 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Its not? Are you sure there's no "reasonable defense" requirement within IP law here for N? Can you explain why it doesn't apply?