Greentext

3994 readers

1387 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

Anon is often crazy.
Anon is often depressed.
Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 11 months ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

678

Anon explains the 2nd amendment (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 3 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

132 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

No, but the US military has never had their homeland logistics fucked with in recent history. Sure you can't easily destroy a Bradley APC, but it needs fuel that happens to be stored and transported in ways that are not as resistant to attack. And when the fuel runs out many vehicles are no longer useful in combat.

Or spare parts. Germany got their industries bombed like crazy in WW2. Even though their stuff was better on paper they didn't have the parts to keep combat effective. Ask any veteran how reliable military vehicles are without constant maintenance.

This is hypothetical and all, but it's not that big of a stretch of the imagination to see any American insurgency becoming a real pain in the ass for the military over months and years. And unlike Afghanistan they can't simply withdraw when they've had enough.