this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2024
579 points (96.0% liked)

Memes

45681 readers
627 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

I'll be that guy that says wars cost a fuckton. So the US gov't can't live war to war because it doesn't help them. Not financially anyway.

*I'm getting a lot of similar messages so: Maybe profitable for industries. Expensive for government. Take a look at any federal deficit and debt.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Maybe not the government or citizens, but war helps the congress members, the CEOs of the military industrial complex, and their families get fabulously wealthy.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago

I'm not talking about what could be. I'm talking about the political reality that surrounds us.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

Then why does the US government constantly do it? Are they stupid?

Isn't this the official story? That they're a clumsy giant who just keeps oopse whoopsie-ing into all these atrocities with no selfish motive?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Profitable for industries. Expensive for government. Take a look at any federal deficit and debt.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_profiteering

The government isn't something that exists above society, but is a facet of it. The MIC directly profits from wars, it pays politicians, politicians are motivated toward hawkish positions, the taxpayer is made to subsidize this. There are many other circuits discussed in the article, as concern the impact war has on the consumer market, how it's used for imperialism, etc.

Ultimately, wealth comes from labor, but the arrangement of war profiteering is extremely good at extracting wealth from labor in all sorts of ways.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

People might have an easier time understanding a statement if it's a full sentence.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Seriously? Government debt is different than private MIC profit.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You're asking me to make your argument for you. Use you words.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Can you not try to construct a syllogism for me? Stating one obvious fact is not an argument.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Wars are plenty profitable if you’re a lot bigger than your opponents and can force them to be subservient to your business interests. It’s not a fluke that the richest country on earth is also the one with the most frequent wars.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is that not the point? Government functions by moving wealth from the public into the private, massive expenses portrayed to be for our benefit end up being excuses for taxes, and the enormous costs facilitate enormous wealth transfers into the private corporations who support and facilitate the wars.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

moving wealth from the public into the private

That's a side effect of capitalism and lobbying (aka bribing) the government for preferential treatment. But it's kind of the opposite of the point of government. Most businesses are incredibly selfish and will cut every corner they can without the government there to enforce workplace safety, market rules, and policing fraud and theft.