this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2024
725 points (93.1% liked)
Technology
59341 readers
5218 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You’re listing all of the reasons it’s not a monopoly - you can go almost anywhere else and buy the same good.
You literally weren’t and literally aren’t, so they’re literally not.
If nobody was in competition with them, they’d be raising their prices.
Boy, do I have some bad news for you...
https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/amazon-used-algorithm-essentially-raise-prices-rcna123410
“Essentially” is the load-bearing weasel word here that allows this story to blame Amazon for their competitors choosing to offer the same goods at higher prices.
"Competitors choosing" is usually considered to be price fixing, which is anti-competitive and/or monopolistic. Amazon et al aren't the only US companies guilty of this or other anti-competitive behaviors, even if they're a notable example.
No? It isn’t?
Where do you think prices come from?
How is this anti-competitive?
This article literally proves their point. When Amazon doesn’t need to compete (because other sites are indexing off their prices) they raise their prices. When they do need to compete (like in the examples OP mentioned) they keep their prices low.