this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2023
66 points (100.0% liked)

Science

13017 readers
10 users here now

Studies, research findings, and interesting tidbits from the ever-expanding scientific world.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At the same time I was more enthused with the tought if the world would have changed as much from the worms' perspective. I don't think the siberian flora and fauna have changed very drastically. Probably the mammoths were still around back then, and that would be the most important change. The climate might be different.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The climate was definitely very different back then. So that would have affected the flora, and there was also a whole bunch of megafauna alive back then that have since gone extinct, likely taking a lot of their gut microbiome with them, since we know that the bacteria and parasites living inside larger animals can be species-specific. I think to the roundworms' perception, there'd actually be a lot of changes in the soil that they would pick up on, that we wouldn't. Like, you know, maybe they were used to eating mammoth poop and now they're in a lab after being woken up, they're eating something that just tastes weird to them because it's not what they were used to. Even pretty simple animals can recognise and respond to changes in their environment, even if they don't question it cognitively.