this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
1211 points (98.4% liked)

People Twitter

5283 readers
890 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't want to drive a smart phone or have it drive me. Give me a car with a pre iPhone dash and Bluetooth and I am happy. I am hoping there will be a market for old people cars with real controls when the vehicles we drive now are no longer maintainable.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Backup cameras are required by law since I think it was 2015? But the trend of gigantic screen with no physical controls seems to be in a "will they/won't they" kinda situation right now with some manufacturers flirting with the idea, some trying it then reverting, etc.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

My current vehicle is mid 2000s, much older than 2015 and standard equipment includes a backup camera that engages in reverse on its perfectly usable 4:3 standard definition screen.

The climate controls are buttons with led indicators and rotary encoders that control a display so while it isn't as distracting as a touch screen it can't be operated fully haptically while eyes are on the road either. It makes sense though as the rear climate controls can be adjusted independently with a wireless remote and in that application it is almost impossible to do things with simple sliders and selector knobs. I am not an absolutist on these things but I appreciate designers putting some thought into the usability of controls instead of going with the cheapest/flashiest solution.