this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2024
716 points (96.0% liked)

News

23024 readers
3708 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

‘I believed things he told me that I now understand to be … lies,’ Dave Hancock says in new Rittenhouse documentary

A former spokesperson for Kyle Rittenhouse says he became disillusioned with his ex-client after learning that he had sent text messages pledging to “fucking murder” shoplifters outside a Chicago pharmacy before later shooting two people to death during racial justice protests in Wisconsin in 2020.

Dave Hancock made that remark about Rittenhouse – for whom he also worked as a security guard – on a Law & Crime documentary that premiered on Friday. The show explored the unsuccessful criminal prosecution of Rittenhouse, who killed Joseph Rosenbaum and Anthony Huber in Kenosha, Wisconsin.

As Hancock told it on The Trials of Kyle Rittenhouse, the 90-minute film’s main subject had “a history of things he was doing prior to [the double slaying], specifically patrolling the street for months with guns and borrowing people’s security uniforms, doing whatever he could to try to get into some kind of a fight”.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 178 points 5 days ago (6 children)

Why is this waste of space still in the news? And a documentary? Seriously? Can we please ignore him going forward and let him be forgotten, unimportant and inconsequential in a hole, like this litte rat deserves?

[–] [email protected] 65 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Hey, he just wants to kill some more people. No big deal right?

checks rulebook

My mistake, murdering shoplifters is actually still kind of a big no-no. Apologies.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 5 days ago (1 children)

he had sent text messages pledging to “fucking murder” shoplifters outside a Chicago pharmacy before later shooting two people to death during racial justice protests in Wisconsin in 2020.

That was before he went to Kenosha.

And honestly, we all knew he did it on porpouse. This is nothing new. Blowing this up and giving it more attention just furthers the right's hero worship of him.

More attention makes it worse. It makes him an Icon and martyr for the white supremacists.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Premeditation and intent. How is this weasely fuck not in prison for life.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The insidious nature of systemic racism is why. White men are given the widest possible berth to acquire weapons and play vigilante. As we saw here, a white guy who talks about murdering people can, over and over, put himself into dangerous situations until he gets the opportunity to kill and get away with it. This isn't even the only example in the last five years.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Usually the situation they put themselves in is taking a job as a cop and refusing to deescalate any situation.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm honestly surprised this little shit hasn't become a cop yet.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago

He was banned from trying to join any branch of the military because he did so poorly on the ASVAB (and probably also failed a psych eval). While many police departments are deeply corrupt, I don't think any of them want the bad press that would come with hiring him. Maybe he can get hired as a deputy in a sheriff's department run by someone like Arpaio.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Because the prosecutor threw the case.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

The judge did his part too.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Really? They put a rule against murder in the book? Is that new? No? Well then they should tell people that! How are we supposed to know not to kill people if they don't tell us that's against the rules!?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

depends on if you’re white and if you can cry on demand (about the punishment)

[–] [email protected] 51 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, he is very consequential. If you went to an NRA self-defense shooting instructor in 2019 and laid out everything Rittenhouse did, and then asked if that was valid self defense, the answer would be unequivocally no. What Rittenhouse found was an argument for shooting protestors and getting away with it.

That's scary, because if you spend much time around gun shows and gun clubs, you'll meet plenty of people who are clearly looking for an excuse to shoot somebody with a legal loophole.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 days ago

The judge created the legal precedent for the loophole.

The greater evil behind it all is a situation where a Blackwater type organization is paid for security and people protest, then they open fire and start killing. They can all use the Rittenhouse defense and get away with it.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 5 days ago

People on the right still believe he was defending himself or just a kid or whatever whatever. This news shows that it was totally planned, that he willingly put himself in harms way to murder people like he was judge, jury, and executioner over some shoplifting.

It’s important that we go “oh look, he really is, undeniably, a rotten piece of filth” and can throw out all these notions of “well-intentioned” people who end up killing people like this.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 days ago (2 children)

For one thing, whether or not you or I like it, he's a right-wing darling and he needs to stop being one.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

And that's exactly why we shouldn't give him attention and media space.

He is a "right-wing darling" because of articles and documentaries like that. He is triggering a negative reaction from the other side and that's why he's hailed a hero by the right.

More attention makes it worse.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

If we do not give him attention, they still will. All you are doing is not letting people know who they think is praiseworthy. I don't see that as helpful.

You do not get to control who the right idolizes. All you can hope to do is shave some of them off by explaining why those people should not be idolized.

Why people who have gone through all of childhood haven't found out that ignoring bullies doesn't actually make them go away is beyond me.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

One of the differences between the right and the left, you just made me realize, is how we treat heroes.

Kyle murders two protestors and he's a hero. He can fuck it up, but that's all it takes to get there.

If a left leaning person became a hero for rescuing cats out of a house fire, you'd have a hundred reporters digging up dirt about how he cuts in line at Starbucks, or an ex coworker thought his obsession with cute animal butts was a little creepy.

I'm minimizing. People who do good things sometimes have done real shit but I don't want to sidetrack. Point is, the right elevates their heroes while the left humanizes them. It's not just a different playing field, it's a whole other sport.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago

Well, he already got himself cancelled once over President Convict's 2nd Amendment bonafides. Maybe he'll do it again and it'll stick this time.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago

I only take issue with you implying rats are bad. They wonderful smart little creatures, cleaner than your family dog, and would never cross state lines armed to kill protestors because they psychotic. Although they may bite your finger mistaking it for food. And damn can their little teeth hurt.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

Let everyone know about his actions. The more people who don't like him - the better.