this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
19 points (95.2% liked)

Hardware

535 readers
32 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Worth pointing out that wafers alone are a relatively small part of the cost of semi conductors.

A 300 mm wafer has about 70,000 mm^2 of area. A Zen 5 chiplet (8 core CCD) seems to be about 70 mm^2. Assuming a 60% yield, that's 600 Zen 5 chiplets.

An 8-core 9700X goes for $350.

So that works out to $210 K revenue for a $30 K wafer. Although I suspect TSMC may also get additional revenue for value add features and services.

That being said, wafer costs are increasing at a very high rate that only seems to be accelerating.

Good position for TSMC to be in, essentially getting a 15% cut for the price of any leading edge semiconductor.