this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2024
114 points (94.5% liked)
Movies and TV Shows
2114 readers
60 users here now
A community for entertainment industry news and general discussion about movies and TV shows.
Rules:
- Be civil.
- Please do not link to pirated content.
- No spoilers in the title of submissions. And please use spoiler MarkDown in the body of discussions. This is a courtesy to other users.
- Comments solely criticizing headlines and/or journalism will be removed for being off-topic.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
A lot of that sort of armor is more designed to deflect hits off of it. If someone can get a solid hit in, it's possible to cut through it.
Which leads to another pet peeve of mine, which is armor that's clearly designed in a way that it wouldn't be good at deflecting hits. Particularly anything for women that has cups for the breasts.
Chain mail, maybe. Plate armour? Not a chance.
You had to go around the plates.
I don't think cutting clean through chainmail is realistic - thrusting is very much so though!
An axe could presumably split into chainmail. Although I suppose it's just as likely to just break whatever is behind it. It's not a great armour for large blunt impacts.
Oh yeah, axe I can see. I was thinking swords.
Just like there were many forms of armour (plate was very expensive), there were many forms of hand weapons. And although the novels (3ven of the time) tended to romanticise the sword, it was mostly a secondary weapon, much like a handgun nowadays.
Well aware :) But since we werr talking movie tropes and swords, my mind was still there.
Would love to see some sources or testing that would supportnyour claim.