this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2024
113 points (97.5% liked)

Games

16751 readers
599 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 month ago (7 children)

I can't wait for a new always online game featuring John Halo with kernel level anticheat which won't work on Linux.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Halo infinite uses non kernel level anti cheat if that means anything.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

yeah chances are they'll stick with EAC and continue to be friendly towards the steam deck (and indirectly towards desktop Linux as a whole)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

EAC is a Kernel-level anti cheat

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

okay cool but it works with a usermode module in Linux for now, and will probably continue to do so.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

no you're cool

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago
load more comments (4 replies)