this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2024
96 points (99.0% liked)
Movies & TV
22938 readers
119 users here now
Rules for Movies & TV Discussion
-
Any discussion of Disney properties should contain a (cw: imperialism) tag. If your post isn't tagged appropriately it will be removed.
-
Anti-Bong Joon-ho trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/movies and submitted to the site administrators for review.
-
On Star Trek Sunday only posts discussing how we might achieve space communism are permitted. Non-Star Trek related content will be removed and you will be temporarily banned until the following Sunday.
Here's a list of tons of leftist movies.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
His performance isn't good but neither are most of the performances in the film, even by talented, well-established actors. The writing and direction is really to blame here. It's hard to be a good actor when you're delivering terrible lines in front of a green screen, talking to a tennis ball on a stick.
As a side note they really should have aged up Anakin to around 13 or 14 instead of like 9. It would have allowed them to find a more charismatic child actor, and removed the weirdness of the Padme age gap.
There were multiple academy award winners and multiple future winners throughout the trilogy. They all had shite performances. Samuel L. Jackson played the most bland dude possible who's only interesting feature was having a purple lightsaber. That's a colossal fuck up all on its own.