this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
115 points (96.0% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

3502 readers
1 users here now

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (9 children)

The Internet hatred for furries always bothered me. I'm not into it, I think it's weird, but so what? I think BDSM is weird too, but we don't treat people into BDSM like we treat furries- as if they're some sort of disease. I've met a few working at sci-fi/comic cons over the years and they've always been really nice, decent people. They just have a kink. Lots of people have kinks.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I think it's the fact that furries tend to bring their kink public. I have not consented to engage in your sex games. If he showed up to a ceremony in leather and a ballgag no one would be ok with it, but the fur suit is the equivalent and I'm expected to applaud.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

bring their kink into public

But it's not a kink for them.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You sound like the kind of person that wants to ban drag story time at the libraries because "kids shouldn't be exposed to someone's kink"

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So the distinction I feel here is that women are people. If a man wants to dress like a woman, sure, most people can interact with women in public, whatever. If you want to call them both, broadly, a form of cosplay, then drag is a costume that doesn't fundamentally change much. Animals aren't people.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

The fursuit is the equivalent??? I'm actually laughing rn people think this???

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

A big part of this misconception is actually from That Episode. You can actually google the phrase That Episode. No need to even specify the show, just those two words are enough (but the show is CSI). There's a bunch to read into if you'd like, but the important bit is that a big part of public opinion - which has only recently begun to change, and only in some parts of the internet - comes from That Episode's portrayal of furries

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the fur suit is the equivalent [of] leather and a ballgag

I mean, no. It's really not.

I do get what you're saying and generally agree otherwise. That one was just a bit much.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree. I’ve seen furries in public and while I find them odd, I never saw any of their costumes as inherently sexual.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They do, though, and therein lies the non-issue.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

except they don’t though, where are you coming up with this?

say someone is attracted to women, right? is every female body they see gonna be viewed exclusively through a sexual lens?

some people get kinky with ropes, are those inherently sexual too? where’s the line?

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago

Would you say the same about police officers, nurses, nuns, motorcycle wear and so on?

If the body isnt indecently exposed i find it hard to draw the line, since everything and nothing is someones kink.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I blame the astroturfing early on. The furry community never really overcame the weird allegations from their first major convention. It also doesn't help that people think furry is JUST a sexual thing.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Imma level with you chief: I would think it was less weird if it was JUST a sexual thing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Furries are odd fellows, but they ~~steam a good ham~~ make a good cooling suit.

It ain't for me, but I do somewhat respect that they have a hobby they're all-in on.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

And many replies here are people hating on furries, and people actually thinking fursuits are primarily a sexual thing, this is wild lmao.

From someone actually from the community, fursuits are NOT a sexual thing for the VAST majority of furries, and should not be treated as such. Can't believe I still have to say this.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Sure they're all nice and great people but I can see the other side, comparing it to BDSM it would be like going to work in a gimp suit.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Right on, sibling

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The problem is that the sexually charged furries have trouble understanding and respecting other's boundaries. This is an even larger problem when you're dealing with a community that tends to appeal to younger people. It doesn't help that there have been several very public cases of well known furries being engaged in things so horrible I'm not even comfortable mentioning it here (hint: age and/or species and/or aliveness).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

People who are into BDSM keep in the bedroom. It's not like they are going out of their way to wear their costumes.

Furries want to wear their costumes every chance they get.