this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
167 points (97.7% liked)

World News

38824 readers
1940 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

JERUSALEM (AP) — Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is examining a plan to seal off humanitarian aid to northern Gaza in an attempt to starve out ~~Hamas militants~~, a plan that, if implemented, could trap without food or water hundreds of thousands of Palestinians unwilling or unable to leave their homes.

Those who remain would be considered combatants — meaning military regulations would allow troops to kill them — and denied food, water, medicine and fuel.

The plan calls for Israel to maintain control over the north for an indefinite period to attempt to create a new administration without Hamas, splitting the Gaza Strip in two.

Human rights groups say the plan would likely starve civilians and that it flies in the face of international law, which prohibits using food as a weapon and forcible transfers. Accusations that Israel is intentionally limiting food to Gaza are central to the genocide case brought against it at the International Court of Justice, charges Israel denies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (4 children)

That's only part of the plan. The full plan is remove every last Palestinian from Gaza and then shove a canal through it. The other end will be at Elat, thus providing a western-controlled alternative to Egypt's Suez.

There would be far more humanitarian ways of going about this, but murder is quicker and silences dissent.

You'll notice that Jordan hasn't been touched during any of this. Got to keep them onside because their port city of Aqaba is uncomfortably close.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The engineering would be implausible and unprofitable. The terrain does not support that type of plan.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The terrain in Panama didn't support it either.

Either way, my comment is accurate up to the word Gaza, "and then" or not.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 20 hours ago

A canal through Israel would involve about 15x the amount of digging as did Panama. Doubling the capacity (Suez + this suggested canal) would cut revenue to less than half (doubling capacity but also introducing market competition). But the operation costs of Suez would also be much lower. Plus all that traffic would create a security risk because it would introduce a new mode of importing terror into the country. It isn't going to happen. This is the stuff of conspiracy theory.

load more comments (2 replies)