this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
528 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

58981 readers
4227 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
528
Winamp deletes entire GitHub source code repo after a rocky few weeks (arstechnica.com)
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
116 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

However, wanting contributions while retaining the exclusive right to distribute the software is anti-collaborative. I’m reluctant to say it might as well be proprietary again

As you describe it, that is proprietary -- no "might as well be" qualification necessary. Just because you can read the source code doesn't make it Open Source; you've got to have all Four Freedoms for it to count.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

the users have the freedom to run, copy, distribute, study, change and improve the software.

Is it not actually four or are they counting some of these as the same thing?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Change and improve sounds pretty much the same to me, as in the process is modifying it, only the intent changes.