this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
7 points (73.3% liked)

Selfhosted

40394 readers
659 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I would like to be able to give people an URL and have them be able to access my service.

Example I have overseerr currently funneled so when the go to url pcname.tail$$$$$.ts.net they are greeted with overseerr. But if I funneled another service at pcname.tail$$$$$.ts.net/immich for example it does nothing just blank loading but the url knows it should be Immich or another service (I can put the url pcname.tail$$$$$.ts.net/immich in the immich app and have it work). I have tried reversing them so I believe I can not set paths after .net..

Am I doing something wrong or is this not supported?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm not super sure what you're asking. I think you have some networking concepts confused with application routing, which in the case of a reverse proxy like this depends on how the forward host is passing requests.

[–] Blxter 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Sorry. I just mean to ask if I can use tailscale and funnel multiple ports in order to give access to a couple different selfhosted applications. I am not sure what application routing is. I am still not sure I explaining it well enough.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It can be done but I’d advice to rather set up a reverse proxy and funnel that. Then set up your reverse proxy accordingly.

Issue with the funnel is that its reverse proxy is a bit limited in rewriting. So if your service has a native url of 127.0.0.1:8000/service1 then you serve it under /service1

If you have several services that expects to be served at root you might find it difficult to do this way. Some services might have “url/path” option in config for this purpose. In that case you enter the url you want to use for your service and it will behave.

[–] Blxter 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ok thanks I will check to see if they have a url/path option.

Do you have a suggestion on a service to set up my own reverse proxy?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I like caddy for flexibility and ease with handle_parh. I believe there was some example on the tailscale website for a tcp caddy proxy.

Some sites cant be rewritten and have to be served on their expected path. Like some http file will refer to a css or something with absolute path.

Also you can get chatgpt or similar help you and ask it to explain whats being done and why. Just be stern and let it know what you’re using for software + versions. They know a lot of old shit too these LLMs

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Perhaps you can rewrite but that would have to include both ways + html source.

Best bet is serve at what path it prefers or can be configured to

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Tailscale doesn't work on a port by port basis, it works by tunneling traffic from one IP net segment to another. I'm not sure what specifically Tailscale has out in front to work as a proxy for your connection, but the transport itself isn't blocking ports or anything.