this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
557 points (80.1% liked)

Science Memes

11148 readers
2979 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Assuming this meme is some form of Marxist propaganda, it would be a self-defeating meme, since Marxism is rooted in dialectical materialism which is itself a scientific process. At least according to Marx.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

ITT it's still the 1920s I guess.

Political theory has moved on since those days, you know.

Granted, there are people who quote Marx like he's a religious figure but those people are wrong and stupid.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Woah woah woah, I'm not a Marxist, but you're going to have to back up your claims on how "political theory has moved on" and why that ties into Marxism not being based on dialectical materialism.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Please list all the recommended political theory you've read from the 1920s to now that disproves whatever you're claiming is purely 1920s political theory.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Heh, you're a leftist? Name every leftism.

Look up critical theory if you want to.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Buddy this is critical theory.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I think I somehow replied to the wrong comment, it was meant to be a reply to the guy who randomly started talking about Marxism

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't want to deflate your assumption, but "Science is pure objectivity and truth".

The assumption you introduced just added another layer on by bringing Marxism into it. And here's the thing with that fallacy; you may be very right! But, it's got nothing to do with the original statement anymore. It's just going down tangents of a tangent that should be explored under their own initiative, not the blanket of "science".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Well i guess you're right. I just wanted to point out an observation. Guess i just got ignoratio elenchied

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Unfortunately that's not how communism works in practice