this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
158 points (98.8% liked)

Asklemmy

43963 readers
1409 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm sorry, you don't get to maul the pronunciation of loan words and then correct people when they use the correct pronunciation. The word comes from the french cache/casher which is pronounced exactly cash-eh. Where do you think the -e comes from?

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

From the Mirriam-Webster website:

A cache is a group of things that are hidden, and is pronounced like "cash." Cachet can mean "prestige," "medicine to be swallowed," or "an official seal," and is pronounced "cash-ay."

Cache and cachet share a common French root โ€“ the verb cacher ("to hide"), which is pronounced \cash-AY\ โ€“ but they are pronounced differently and mean two different things

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In English, yes. My point is that cache/r/t is the root of both words, the pronunciation changed in english which often happens with loan words, and it certainly is OK to use the local pronunciation -- but correcting someone who uses the correct pronunciation of that word, with self-righteous indignation even, is very silly behavior.

"But we've been pronouncing it wrong for 300 years!"

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If we said every loan word the way they were originally pronounced in their various native languages then English wouldn't exist.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Perhaps, probably not - not my point though. My native language has a lot of English loan words with local pronunciation, which is the correct pronunciation of those words in my language according to any dictionary, however to indignantly correct someone using the original english pronunciation for saying it "wrong" would just be bizarre.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Cool story bro. How about this, you continue to say cache however you want and I'll continue to silently judge you for it and we can all just move on with our day?

๐Ÿ‘

[โ€“] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Fine by me, it's obvious you no longer have an argument -- or anything otherwise interesting -- to contribute to this discussion anyway, so what would be the point?

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I'm not sure what the point of any of this was. It seemed to serve little purpose.

Have a nice day ๐ŸŒž

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

cacher does, but cache as in "cache-toi !" (go hide!) and "je me cache" (I'm hiding) are pronounced "cash".

Besides, "correct" pronunciation in a different language is pretty meaningless. The word may have come from French but we're speaking English, not French.

Also, it might not be a loan word so much as a legacy-of-foreigners-taking-over word (c.f. the Normand invasion of Britain), which doesn't tend to help the language's users care about respecting the "original" pronunciation. I'm not certain when exactly cachet entered English.