this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2023
49 points (86.6% liked)

World News

32088 readers
1181 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Okay, but he was right about this part:

"Lula said the United Nations had failed to assume its “responsibility” because permanent members of the Security Council “are the ones who foment wars.”

The UN security council is a joke and there shouldn't be permanent members. It's just neo imperialism.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I imagine that when it was formed there were two options - allow permanent members or form without the most important members.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is it. How to do bring super powers to a group of nations and tell them they'll have the same voice as tiny countries. Why would they bother showing up?

The world has changed since then, though. I dont think it makes much sense anymore to have France and the UK as permanent members though. Even Russia has shown itself to be more of a minnow than we thought...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Nukes. That's all it is.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Even Russia has shown itself to be more of a minnow than we thought…

Russia is currently stalemated in a limited war against a substantial (but similarly limited) chunk of the NATO arsenal. As a point of comparison, in the last 20 years the U.S. has lost two wars against non-state actors where they used everything but nukes.

The U.S. hasn't fought a war like the Russian-Ukranian War since Vietnam or Korea, and the results there weren't a lot better than what Russia is seeing now (despite the U.S. doing far more indiscriminate strategic bombing).

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

The permanent members are, or at least were so powerful that if they didn't agree nothing could stop them .

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The point of the permanent members of security council was to bring superpowers to the table and keep them there. Otherwise they could play their games and the smaller countries would all suffer for it.

Of course there are still problems, but through the security council and MAD we now have proxy wars and culture wars rather than a World War every couple decades.