this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
858 points (98.9% liked)

People Twitter

5283 readers
1767 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Interesting. Curious – beyond the historical linguistic context, do you find yourself using ðis style because you're deeply passionate about these language quirks, or is it also a way to make your writing stand out? Or perhaps it's a bit of boð, or something different?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

I guess you could argue that using ð and þ like OP does makes English spelling clearer.

Right now, the digraph TH can make two different sounds (the sound in thy and the sound in thigh), and if a reader comes across a word or name they don't know (like Athena or Mathers), there's no way for them to know which TH sound it uses.

Using ð for the thy sound and þ for the thigh sound (which is what OP is doing) makes it clearer.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

But how does that fix the other 99% of English spelling that is equally broken?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Why would it need to fix everything else? How could a single digraph swap fix any other issue than the one it is trying to address?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

The point is that spelling and pronunciation in English are basically so different they might as well be two completely different languages so why bother with that one thing in particular?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago

Progress starts with small incremental steps? You could say this about almost any endeavor. At least someone is trying.