this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
1400 points (98.1% liked)

Science Memes

11441 readers
1056 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I mean yeah that’s true.

But on reddit reposts were everywhere and it was very common for bots to karma farm by doing so, so calling it out had a purpose.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

People who have already seen something know they've seen it. They can just skip it. To somebody else it will be new. The vast majority of items being called reposts on reddit were things I had never seen. Whining about reposts might give someone a false sense of accomplishment, but I found it to be useless noise.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

One feature I feel like I want to see eventually is a list of links to reposts attached at the top of the post, so if someone reposts the same thing, or topic, or question, then if another person recognizes it and finds a previous link, the link could be added to the list and anyone who wants to see the "extended universe" of comments can browse them. That way discussion's larger context is far more easy to see, and quality answers for example can be more easily found by anyone browsing after the link has been found.

I'm not sure if it would be if genuine utility, but people are already doing the work of finding these links to the past, I feel like we might as well make it official and make it a feature?

I'm curious what the rest of you think.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, I think this is a great idea. An automatic implementation would be easy if it's a repeat of a that was already posted. Somewhat more difficult if it's the same news but from a different source - dunno if that's even technically a repost but it kind of is.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

A more loosely defined "related/variation" list of links might get very big, but I don't feel like it absolutely shouldn't be done. I don't know, maybe.

Might be able to add a second set to expand the feature if the repost list is successful and useful.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The link list could have a max size and oldest items could drop off.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't love the idea of that kind of automatic deletion

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I didn't mean deleting the old posts I meant they would no longer appear on the repost history.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I don’t love the idea of that kind of automatic deletion of the links from the list.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

reposts should still probably be labelled as such and link back to older posts

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

That's not a terrible idea - it would be a link to the existing discussion of the topic, which is informative. I like that better than people just whining RePoSt!!1!