Australian News

551 readers

25 users here now

A place to share and discuss news relating to Australia and Australians.

Rules

Follow the aussie.zone rules
Keep discussions civil and respectful
Exclude profanity from post titles
Exclude excessive profanity from comments
Satire is allowed, however post titles must be prefixed with [satire]

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Banner: ABC

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Nacc to reconsider whether to investigate robodebt after ‘apprehended bias’ finding against commissioner (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Furness recommended the Nacc revisit the controversial decision, which had already been the subject of 900 complaints when she promised in June to inquire into the matter.

Following the inspector’s recommendation, the Nacc will now appoint an “independent eminent person” to deliberate afresh on a possible corruption investigation into robodebt.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

In a country where a 10yo indigenous kid can be held fully responsible for their crimes we still can't prosecute rich and powerful people who have full comprehension of their actions and know they will never face consequences. We can lower the age of criminal responsibility to sweep inconvenient social issues created by bad economic and social policy under the carpet. So why can't we lower the bar for criminal responsibility in cases of maladministration, fraud and favoritism by public officials? Surely they should be held to higher standards than some ignorant kid.