this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
413 points (99.8% liked)

Linux Gaming

15374 readers
297 users here now

Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.

This page can be subscribed to via RSS.

Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.

Resources

WWW:

Discord:

IRC:

Matrix:

Telegram:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It's not P2W though, right? I thought they only sell cosmetics w/o competitive advantage (outside a mistake here and there), everything that actually impacts competitiveness is provided equally to everyone.

If that's not the case, could you link something that indicates that?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I would say you are right, because all the playable legends are able to be bought with the free currency you can get by just playing the game.

I guess some people could make the argument that paying players have faster access to new legends and legendary finishers, etc. I would say this is more like "pay to skip some grinding" than "pay to win".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, if it's unlockable in a reasonable amount of time (say, 5-10 hours per hero), then it's basically the same as those stupid F2P mobile games where you can pay to "speed up time" or whatever. Or if there's a rapid churn where you lose access to heroes after some amount of time (i.e. even if you pay, they'd disappear).

But if you can grind for a few hours to get the hero you want, then yeah, not P2W.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

You have to pay to unlock heroes, many of which can improve your performance once you find one that best matches your playstyle. I consider that P2W.