this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
120 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

59147 readers
2245 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (3 children)

At whatever age they want to.

holy shit why would you deprive kids of (often their only way to have any) social contacts and think you're the good guys

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 minutes ago* (last edited 3 minutes ago)

The "good guys" gotta ensure "good thinking" to do more gooder! \s

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, same with sugar, cigarettes and alcohol. Give these children what they want.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 minutes ago* (last edited 2 minutes ago)

Cigarettes and alcohol are proven cancerous, physically addictive, etc.

I don't think legislation should be based on mental gymnastics.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

You wanna get a kiddy diddler messing with your kid? Because that's how you get a kiddy diddler messing with your kid.

The same parent that handed the kid a device to be on social media can also take the kid out somewhere to socialize with other kids.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 minute ago* (last edited 57 seconds ago)

Pretty sure you get a kiddy diddler messing with your kid by going to church.

When they gonna ban church for kids under 16?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Satanic Panic but this time about pedophiles.

These laws will be used to restrict information, not to protect anyway, don't delude youraelf.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

I don't care about the laws, I don't think parents should be allowing access to social media to their five year olds. Preteens maybe, with heavy supervision, yeah that's reasonable, but not toddlers for fuck's sake.

The law can go fuck itself, sure, but parents need to step the fuck up in this day and age. There is no reason for a 1st grader to be posting to X/FB/whatever. They should be playing Legos, riding bikes, and digging holes in the playground dirt.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 hours ago

I've been in online communities since shortly after my 10th birthday and this has never once been a problem.

Most of my friends when I was a teenager were people I met online. It was beyond a reasonable doubt good for me to be on the Internet during that time because it was the only place where I fit in, where I could be myself.

If I ever have kids, I hope they fit in better than I did offline, but if they don't, there is no way I am going to prevent them from socializing in online communities.