this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2024
531 points (92.1% liked)

News

23301 readers
4383 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Following Donald Trump’s recent election victory, Google searches for “4B,” a South Korean feminist movement advocating a “no sex, no dating, no marriage, no children” stance, surged in the U.S.

The 4B movement, popular among young women on social media, promotes individual resistance against conservative politics and the erosion of reproductive rights.

The trend reflects a broader ideological divide between young men and women in the U.S., where women under 30 are significantly more liberal than men.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It doesn’t seem generalized at all to me.

  • A series of laws are passed that make this thing riskier.
  • Do less of the risky thing.
  • Make it clear why.

What’s the problem?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Hmm so this movement excludes men that want abortion to be available then? Missed that.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think the subtext implies that you can have sex with people that don't suck. This is the female counterpart to, "don't stick your dick in crazy".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Did really some of the American women need for Trump to be elected twice before learning this? Isn’t this supposed to be common sense, not just only for women?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Either everyone but you is stupid, or you’re missing something.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

Maybe I’m missing something but I don’t understand why a movement is necessary to understand that you shouldn’t have sex with people that, in your opinion, suck

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I mean the "no sex, no kids, no marriage" slogan seems not that.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

Taking into context that it's to protest people against reproductive rights, I take it that it's to punish and withhold specifically from those people.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think they are more saying none of that with people who don't respect our right to our own bodies

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

That is mentioned nowhere in this argument. But the credo of the movement is:

No sex. No dating. No marrying men. No children.

This sounds pretty intentionally absolute in nature

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

A quote taken right from the article, “They can’t have both. Young women don’t want to be intimate with men who don’t fight for women’s rights; it’s showing they don’t respect us.”

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

It's about risk management, first and foremost.

I suppose you might get a second look from a 4B-practitioner if you had a vasectomy (i.e. to remove the risk of pregnancy), but I'm a man so I can only speculate on this. And of course this isn't such a great option if you do plan to have kids some day. Then again, despite the anti-abortion rhetoric of "don't have sex if you aren't ready to reproduce", planned pregnancies are much more dangerous under abortion bans.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Would you mind saying what you mean here? I’d like for you to explain your thought a little more.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm responding to "it doesn't seem generalized at all". If that were the case it would not be a movement based on absolutes that apply to all men

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It most certainly doesn’t exclude anyone unless you think someone refusing to have sex with you is an act of exclusion.

Most of all of us are refusing to have sex with you at this very moment.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This seems to assume that I'm concerned this will impact me. I'm not, at all. Not slightly. It wouldn't even impact me if I were even single, which I'm not.

I could probably put out an ad on Craigslist offering to pay someone like this for an interview and still never meet such a person or even get an email back about it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

It seems that way because I chose to say “you”, which is my bad. I meant it in the broader sense though, most of us are choosing not to sleep with the rest of us, most of the time.

There is no added exclusion to that just because some of us become more firm in refusing to, and give reasons why.