this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
993 points (98.4% liked)

Programming Humor

2736 readers
63 users here now

Related Communities [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

Other Programming Communities [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Why devs, why?

When you're opening a jpeg it is transformed into a Gimp datafile so you can edit it.
"Saving" as jpeg would remove all your editing history, collapse all layers, and perform lossy compression on the resulting image.
Since losing most of the info included in your open file is not really what you want when you hit "save", they put it behind the "Export" button.

I guess it would be more logically consistent if the workflow for editing images was to create a new Gimp project, then import a jpeg into it, the way some video editing software does it.
But that would be even less convenient.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah I know, I just don't want to save that clutter in a file format you can't use elsewhere.

Photoshop only makes you save in the .psd format if you have added layers, data outside the image etc. Otherwise it just saves it to a jpg or png or whatever it was when you opened it. This is the correct way IMO.