Update: fixed
this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
311 points (97.6% liked)
Shitty admin
167 readers
40 users here now
Welcome to Shitty Admin!
This community is for shit posting about terrible things computer admin do. Cross posts are welcome and so is satire.
Please no politics or harmful content
founded 1 week ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Well, I certainly wouldn't want to get into a disagreement with someone who clearly knows more about file compression than I do.
I was trying to make a joke where his crushed computer was merely compressed and I was using a terminal command to decompress the computer, as if it were a file.
I wasn't specifying tar as a file format. I was running the program "tar" using a terminal command.
I think that if you pointed the command I used at a compressed file, it'd decompress it but what do I know?
Yeah, you're right and your "achsully" buddy doesn't know how modern tar works. Yes, basic tar doesn't compress, but adding -z triggers the use of gzip (hence .tar.gz) to add compression. You can also use other options to specify different compression algorithms/programs to use (eg lzma)
i know, but after you add a compression method to it, tar still doesn't compress. Only the other, actual compression algorythm you add to it, like gz, xz, bz2, zst, rz, etc. I do know how modern tar works, but no matter how modern it is, it still can't compress files. It only calls a file compressor at most
What does it matter? The OP never implied tar itself compresses, just that the mentioned command could try to decompress regardless of what happens underneath.