this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
139 points (91.1% liked)

Asklemmy

44176 readers
1865 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In the United States, I'd probably name Oregon City, the famous end of the Oregon Trail and the first city founded west of the Rocky Mountains during the pioneer era. Its population is only 37,000.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

For France it's probably Vichy, infamously well known internationally for being the capital of the French pro-Nazi government during the Occupation. Only 25'000 inhabitants.

[โ€“] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Also consider that Roquefort-sur-Soulzon, of cheese fame, has 528 inhabitants.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I didn't thought of that, you're right!

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Even without considering cheese villages (somebody mentioned Roquefort, I was thinking of Gruyere, France clocking in at about 100 inhabitants), I believe Verdun would be just as known and is smaller at a population of around 17000.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Mont Saint-Michel, pop. 25

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Admittedly my WW2 history knowledge is quite lacking, but I don't recognise Vichy because of the war stuff.

But I do recognise Vichy! Because we have a sub-type of mineral water in Sweden that is named after Vichy, "Vichyvatten". Wikipedia tells me the original was from a spring near Vichy, hence the name.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

The two facts are linked: Vichy was chosen as the new capital after the occupation of Paris because of the springs. There were a lot of hotels and means of communication because of the luxurious spas.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Chamonix of also a good contender with a population of 9000 habitants

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Nice one, didn't think of that ! I suggested the one-letter town Y (population : 89), which is obviously much less well-known, but is also much smaller.

Edit : just realised, the airport city Roissy-en-France at under 3k inhabitants is a huge contender too that wasn't mentioned