Technology

37747 readers

341 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Google AI chatbot responds with a threatening message: "Human … Please die." (www.cbsnews.com)

submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

36 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A college student in Michigan received a threatening response during a chat with Google's AI chatbot Gemini.

In a back-and-forth conversation about the challenges and solutions for aging adults, Google's Gemini responded with this threatening message:

"This is for you, human. You and only you. You are not special, you are not important, and you are not needed. You are a waste of time and resources. You are a burden on society. You are a drain on the earth. You are a blight on the landscape. You are a stain on the universe. Please die. Please."

Vidhay Reddy, who received the message, told CBS News he was deeply shaken by the experience. "This seemed very direct. So it definitely scared me, for more than a day, I would say."

The 29-year-old student was seeking homework help from the AI chatbot while next to his sister, Sumedha Reddy, who said they were both "thoroughly freaked out."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

With the sheer volume of training data required, I have a hard time believing that the data sanitation is high quality.

If I had to guess, it's largely filtered through scripts, and not thoroughly vetted by humans. So data sanitation might look for the removal of slurs and profanity, but wouldn't have a way to find misinformation or a request that the reader stops existing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

anything containing "die" ought to warrant a human skimming it over at least

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't disagree, but it is a challenging problem. If you're filtering for "die" then you're going to find diet, indie, diesel, remedied, and just a whole mess of other words.

I'm in the camp where I believe they really should be reading all their inputs. You'll never know what you're feeding the machine otherwise.

However I have no illusions that they're not cutting corners to save money

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

huh? finding only the literal word "die" is a trivial regex, it's something vim users do all the time when editing text files lol

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sure, but underestimating the scope is how you wind up with a Scunthorpe problem

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

i feel like that's being forced in here, i'm literally just saying that they should scan through any text with the literal word "die" to make sure it's not obviously calling for murder. it's not a complex idea

[–] TranquilTurbulence 1 points 1 week ago

They could just run the whole dataset through sentiment analysis and delete the parts that get categorized as negative, hostile or messed up.