Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54758 readers

354 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others

Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

💰 Please help cover server costs.


Ko-fi	Liberapay

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Looking for sources for 2160p HDR TV series (that could be automated) (beehaw.org)

submitted 5 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I have been using showrss for very long time to get a rss feed of my tv shows. unfortunately they dont support more than 1080p. I've been looking to upgrade to something that allow me to automate downloads that supports 4k and HDR releases of shows. I don't have access to any private tracker atm.

I currently use the software flexget to automate my downloading, if that is important.

what are my options?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Sonarr, public trackers, usenet

[+] [email protected] -10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

honestly. why did you even bother writing this answer? if you think my question is dumb just ignore it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That was a perfectly good answer. I have 2 sonarr setups with one exclusively for 4k content. If you configure it correctly it's completely automatic.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

yes, but my question is specifically about 'sources'. Saying "public trackers" is like asking how to get to a supermarket and answering "use the roads". Also a lot of public tracker sites do not have a API readily availble, hence my question.

In the end I learned about prowlarr and jackett, which is the piece I was missing.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago

It's a simple question with a simple answer, and one that's been asked and answered repeatedly. But I don't think it's a dumb question, which is why I answered it with a sufficient answer.