this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
141 points (97.3% liked)

RPGMemes

10342 readers
4 users here now

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
141
(s3.eu-central-2.wasabisys.com)
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

@rpgmemes

Some players are on MinMax overdrive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I've seen that rule before. They didn't carry it forward into the new rules, and for good reasons.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That rule comes from Tasha's Cauldron of Everything which is compatible with the 2024 update so it's still a valid RAW interpretation according to WOTC.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They carried forward all the other optional rules from Tasha's, and not the that one. Clearly they didn't like something about it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They didn't carry Artificers forward into the new PHB but they're still a valid class. This rule not being in the newest books only means it didn't need modification to fit with the new material not that it is no longer valid.

2024 is not a new version that completely replaces 2014, it's an update where things stay the same unless they're mentioned in the newer material, hence all the official adventure books being compatible with 2024.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'd agree in general, but they copied the other rule about falling into liquid off the same page from Tasha's without modifications and not the rules for falling onto other creatures.

They specifically chose not to have those rules when it would have been no effort to add them.

And they did update falling, by adding the section about falling into liquid, and describing it as a hazard.

That signals to me they very clearly did not want those rules as the new baseline for the game.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

That's a valid argument. I still disagree, but I can see your point.