this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2024
14 points (93.8% liked)

Free Software

1053 readers
26 users here now

What is free software?

Free software is software that respects the 4 software freedoms. The 4 freedoms are

Please note: Free software does not relate to monetary price. Free software can be sold or gratis (no cost)

Rules:

  1. Please keep on topic
  2. Follow the Lemmy.zip rules
  3. No memes
  4. No "circle jerking" or inflammatory posts
  5. No discussion of illegal content

Please report anything you believe to violate the rules and be sure to include rhetoric on why you think it should be removed.

If you would like to contest mod actions please DM me with your rational as to why you feel that the relivant mod action should be reversed. Remember to use rhetoric and to site any relevant sources. You will only get one chance to argue your point and continued harassment will result in a ban.

Overall this community is pretty laid back and none if the things list above normally are an issue.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
possiblylinux127
14
Looking for tool recommendations (self.freesoftware)
submitted 13 hours ago by indie_wall to c/freesoftware
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A couple of devs created indie-wall.com for creators to promote their work. The site has recently been re-launched to include many types of Indie content, not just games, and we are hoping to flesh out our list of good tools.

Extra points go to tools that not many people know about. Godot is good, but most people already know about it. Please post your recommendations here. If you take the extra time to post it to the site, that would of course be appreciated, but please do be sure to share your recommendations with this community.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] indie_wall 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks, there are some interesting ones in that list.

They don't necessarily have to be for games, in fact we are trying to expand the site's horizons past games.

Did you know that Signal was funded by the CIA, and used the platform's users as cover for their communications of operations in foreign countries?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

They don’t necessarily have to be for games, in fact we are trying to expand the site’s horizons past games.

I'll see if I can find anything else then!

Signal was funded by the CIA

So I looked into this back when that article came out, and the first part was very misleading. I worry that bad actors keep spreading that in order to push people towards dangerous alternatives. The source pushing that claim was also saying that TOR was a honeypot, without offering much evidence for it. Journalists around the world rely on TOR to communicate with vulnerable sources, and scaring people away from TOR is dangerous.

The past discussion is here, and I've copied some of it below: https://lemmy.ca/post/16397504/7661724

CIA → RFA → OTF → Signal

My understanding is that the CIA operated a news agency in the 50s, then decades later the 2012 president of the news agency started the Open Technology Fund to "help better protect reporters and sources for the news organization with enhanced digital security technology". That organization made (publicly documented) investments in projects including the Tor Project and Signal. Even if someone thinks the OTF is sinister, the total amount over 5 years was $3M.

used the platform’s users as cover for their communications of operations in foreign countries

This part is possible, and since I haven't heard that claim before I don't have anything on hand to comment on it directly.

I would argue that even if the CIA benefited from the presence of encrypted communication in the past, Signal does more than enough good in the world protecting people from surveillance, oppression, and censorship that it is worth recommending.

Since the app is open source and constantly scrutinized, I trust that any shady changes to the code will be caught and called out quickly.

[–] indie_wall 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I suppose it all depends on how comfortable someone is getting close to the CIA. At the very least, I think people should know who they are dealing with when signing up to a platform like that. It would be naïve to think that an organisation like the CIA funds their interests directly.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

TOR was also funded and initially developed by the US Gorvernment as well (I think it was the Navy). It's still best in class at what it does, and there's been no evidence of any sort of back door in the long time it has been running. It was also likely a "more non-government users provide better masking for clandestine government work" situation as well.

Ghidra is one of the best software reverse engineering tools out there, and it's an open source NSA project.

People absolutely should know, and ultimately what you do and don't promote is up to you. That said, most people in privacy and cybersecurity communities do not have concerns about the government connection when the tools are open source and essily auditable.

[–] indie_wall 1 points 3 hours ago

Keeping in mind of course that getting cleared following an audit means nothing was found, not that no exploits exist.