this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2024
94 points (98.0% liked)

Linux

5420 readers
4 users here now

A community for everything relating to the linux operating system

Also check out [email protected]

Original icon base courtesy of [email protected] and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 37 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Variety is good to a point. Too many alternatives and all you get is a bunch of under-resourced and unpolished results.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I disagree.

This assumes that progress on one distro doesn't lead to progress on others.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

There is a difference between feature development and distro maintenance/packaging.

Feature development is done upstream and does flow down to others.

Distro maintenance and packaging is downstream, and almost never provides value to other distros. It usually doesn't even provide value to the next release. Distro maintenance is a hard, thankless Sisyphean task.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You think there is a dearth of software engineers out there who can't spend time on something cool like a linux distro?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Well, yeah. Its pretty well established that there is fairly limited resources in open source. Loads of software engineers, very few contributors.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

We can try to lower the barrier of entry. But nowadays open source maintainers have to actually limit controbutions due to a significant increase in supply chain attacks and generally untrustworthy code contributions.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Maybe because of projects that aren't interested in the opinions of distro maintainers, let alone individual contributors.