Asklemmy

44123 readers

502 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

122

What's wrong with bluesky? (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

130 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Seriously i have zero idea what is going on with bluesky. I never used it. Why are people saying it's centralised? I also heard that a lot of people are joining it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Eyck_of_denesle 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Lets take football an example. It's not niche, it's quite popular. I searched football on mastadon and couldn't by find more than one post in the timeline of 4 months. That's unusable for regular folk.

I agree with what you are saying. But the regular folk just hate the void. They want more interaction and they see centralization as a feature and not as a problem.

Also in terms of UI, discoverability, content, starter-packs, custom feeds etc are all "better".

People don't care if ads roll out, I'm also surprised. But they don't. Even their reasoning for twitter they state the toxicity and never ads.