this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2024
26 points (96.4% liked)
Advent Of Code
985 readers
28 users here now
An unofficial home for the advent of code community on programming.dev!
Advent of Code is an annual Advent calendar of small programming puzzles for a variety of skill sets and skill levels that can be solved in any programming language you like.
AoC 2024
Solution Threads
M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ||||||
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
23 | 24 | 25 |
Rules/Guidelines
- Follow the programming.dev instance rules
- Keep all content related to advent of code in some way
- If what youre posting relates to a day, put in brackets the year and then day number in front of the post title (e.g. [2024 Day 10])
- When an event is running, keep solutions in the solution megathread to avoid the community getting spammed with posts
Relevant Communities
Relevant Links
Credits
Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient
console.log('Hello World')
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Python
Part 1: Simulate the guard's walk, keeping track of visited positions
Part 2: Semi brute-force. Try to place an obstacle at every valid position in the guard's original path and see if it leads to a loop.
How long did brute force take? Mine was 9s on an m1 with rust.
My rust code ran in 6s on my phone (Samsung A35 running under Termux). When I'm back at a computer it'd be interesting to compare times properly.
About 15-20 seconds, not too bad.
I got mine down to 3s, but it wasn't a very smart loop detection. All I did was count steps and stop after 10000. The 9 second run was 100000 steps, which is obviously a bit excessive.
Does save iterating over the list of past visits, so probably a good shortcut.
I did a similar approach (place obstacles on guards path). Takes about ~~80s~~ 10-15s in 11th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-11800H. Motivated by the code above, I also restricted the search to start right before the obstacle rather than the whole path which took it down from 80s to 10-15s
That's about how long it takes for my python solution to complete.
How did you detect loops? I just ran for 100000 steps to see if I escaped, got my time down to 3s by doing only 10000 steps.
I added each visited position/direction to a set, and when a 'state' is reached again you have entered a loop:
You can view my full solution here.
Not who you asked but: I save coordinates and direction into a vector each time the guard faces a #. Also every time the guard faces a #, I check if the position exists in the vector, if true, itβs an infinite loop. 78ms rust aolution.
That's probably quite optimal, compared with checking every state in the path, or running off a fixed number of steps