this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2024
208 points (96.8% liked)

Data is Beautiful

1285 readers
1 users here now

Be respectful

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Not Oprah. Probably all 1999 other known billionaires to a greater or lesser degree, though. Social mobility is rung-by-rung; you can do multiples in theory but you have to get really lucky that many times in a row.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This list is far from complete. The entirety of western royalty is missing for one thing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

That's a good point. Charlie III is so hereditary it's his whole brand. It looks like he might not actually have a billion, though, just most of one.

I'm not sure if any other European Royal families might have managed to retain more.

[–] Cethin 2 points 2 weeks ago

It's rung-by-rung, but the people in front of you are pulling it up behind them.