this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2024
103 points (100.0% liked)

SneerClub

1011 readers
1 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If you don't know any better, ie haven't lived long enough, then it sounds like a logical and compelling ideology

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (3 children)

yeah, until they pull out their machine god they absolutely have to build, because otherwise trillions of simulated humans will be tortured forever and that's not mathing in their sum of all happiness. also it never occurred to them that maybe billionaires shouldn't exist and instead post things like this:

totally not a cult btw

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm with you, but someone who kills the CEO of a health insurance company does not strike me as someone who dismisses real/immediate suffering out of hand.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ironically the trolley problem meme here is a great example of the objection: the same set up that puts him in the position to pull the lever also requires that people be tied to the track.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Also they could pull a lot more levers, but those other levers are not pulled. See how musk paid 6.5 times fixing world hunger for twitter.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Realistic version: pulling the lever would save five lives but that decision would cost shareholders $7.23. What should you do?

10/10 CEOs fail this test!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, if you're from the same socioeconomic sphere as him and haven't lived long enough. The only people I've ever met or heard of that are effective altruists are "upper middle class" or properly wealthy.....and younger than 50.....

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I guess because I was an idiot cringe atheist rationalist realist (you know the type) when I was his age, and thanks to an open mind and some very patient very wise people in my life, I was able to grow out of it, I give people like that the benefit of the doubt as long as they're otherwise kind and open-minded.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My issue isn't with the basic ideals of effective altruisim, it's with how it's used by the wealthy to fleece people with the idea of helping people.
There's not a single thing wrong with being a starry-eyed idealist. Especially if you act, bring your beliefs and ideals into fact.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

I think we're on the same page