Technology
Which posts fit here?
Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
[email protected]
[email protected]
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
view the rest of the comments
It's not actually too much less reliable than condoms. Both of which usually fail due to improperly being used.
*Edit: I added links as proof further down the comment chain here, since y'all are better at downvoting than researching.
if you don't realize why this is an absurd statement to make, i suggest you read it out to yourself a couple times
Nope. Didn't work.
Also, it's a legitimate fact based on plenty of data by reputable sources and governments.
Perhaps you can link to some of those reputable sources and governments then?
https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/birth-control/withdrawal-pull-out-method/how-effective-is-withdrawal-method-pulling-out
https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/birth-control/condom/how-effective-are-condoms
Summary of the two links above is that when used perfectly, pull out method results in a 4% chance per year for pregnancy, and condoms result in a 2% chance per year for pregnancy. Real world usage (because people usually don't do things correctly) is 22% per year chance with pull out, and 13% chance with condoms.
So if done correctly, pulling out is 2% more likely than condoms, and if not done correctly it's 9% more likely than condoms.
You're saying DOUBLING the chances is negligible
I'm not sure if you're bad at math or just mad you're wrong.
2% is half of 4%
Yeah, but if you double a very small percentage, it's still a very small percentage. That's the part you don't seem to grasp. So what if it's "doubled" when the end result is still only 4%.