this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2024
328 points (99.4% liked)

YUROP

1265 readers
233 users here now

A laid back community for good news, pictures and general discussions among people living in Europe.

Other European communities

Other casual communities:

Language communities

Cities

Countries

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Dude, in the first link straight away:

has not reached its goal to reduce car journeys,

That does not mean it didn't reduce them.

You even sounds more like a propagandist with your :

Just because someone has a different opinion than you, doesn't make it "Propagandist".

Lol get your facts right, then we can discuss.

Then you say the tram in Montpellier isn't good, like what on earth does that have to do with anything? And FYI I actually lived there for around 6 years, and yes the tram was slow and doesn't work well when it rains, but that was the case before it became free . Your point?

You are just word-salading to hide that you are wrong lol.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That does not mean it didn’t reduce them.

Yes that's explicitly what they meant. Most new passengers were people who were Walking or cycling before, but not a Lot of people who were driving before

Then you say the tram in Montpellier isn’t good, like what on earth does that have to do with anything?

That you should Invest the funds used for free Public Transport in improving the Network and it's quality.

Don't get me wrong, you should still offer cheap/free Tickets to People who need them, but nothing wrong to collect additional funds to finance the system

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

Most

Most. Not all or nothing. So your initial statement is still wrong.

Also, why pay it with ticket sales which costs more than raw taxes?