this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2024
78 points (89.0% liked)

Asklemmy

44152 readers
1222 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Alcohol.

Lots and lots of people lean heavily on it and think that alcohol is the spice of their life. When, it contributes to so many problems than it's so-called benefits. We tried, in America anyways, to outright ban alcohol. Problem was that the person who wanted it banned, was too extremist.

Like he didn't think it all through and think just going for the jugular of the problem is what will work. When, it didn't and just made people work around it until eventually the ban was dismantled.

So, since then, we've been putting up with drunk drivers, drunk disputes, drunk abusers and other issues. I still wish we could just slam our hands down at the desk and demand we sit to discuss in how to properly deal with this issue than people proclaiming that it's not a problem.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sp3tr4l 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

In the US and Canada?

Car dependency / Car centrism.

Sure, we have a few large cities with non roadway mass transit.

But uh, in general, we've got terminal car brain, and I do not see this fundamentally changing.

The vast majority of places will continue being designed around cars instead of people.

Cars and fuel costs will keep going up, less and less people will have them, and (again excepting a few extremely dense and expensive cities) we will just go to mass private car rentals/shares instead of actual mass transit or meaningfully redesigning cities.

Sidewalks? Bike lanes? Go fuck yourself, you don't matter if you don't own a car, wait an hour for a bus (if one exists), get an uber, have a friend with a car.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I wouldn't be so pessimistic. The Netherlands was also a car dependent place that bulldozed neighbourhoods for highways a few dozen years ago and look at where they are now. Change can happen, it just needs a critical mass of supporters and time, lots of time.

[–] sp3tr4l 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Us Americans just elected a fascist, who won the popular vote, who wants to do the exact opposite of a massive infrastructure rework, he and his sycophants want to cut every kind of government funding for social and government services of all kinds, keep 'joking' about invading Mexico, annexing Canada, buying Greenland.

We do not have a mass of supporters who are effective at applying pressure on the government... because we now, even more obviously, live in a naked oligarchy that controls the government and mass media... our democracy is broken, our representatives are purchased, our population heavily subject to anti intellectual right wing propoganda funded by oligarchs.

We also do not have lots and lots of time.

Many states in the US are currently seeing home insurance companies either dramatically raising rates or just leaving: The climate catastrophe driven collapse of many areas has begun, and it will only get worse without a massive coordinated government directed response... which goes dorectly against the ideology of most of our oligarchs and most of our people who believe what those oligarchs tell them to via the media they own.

We will not have the money to build out better transit infrastructure ... that will all be spent responding to more and more intense natural disasters and internal migrants.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wait til the petro dollar crashes. It's going to be hilarious

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

EVs are coming, no matter how expensive/wasteful, you'd always have a car option.

[–] sp3tr4l 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Are there EV longhaul trucks that are at cost and performance parity with ICE longhaul trucks on the horizon?

I don't think so.

That means that logistics costs for basically everything gets significantly more expensive when ICE fuel costs go up.

We could lessen this problem by building out more freight rail capacity, and a whole lot more minor rail lines so that trucks don't routinely drive halfway across the continent and are used less often...

...but we are not.

So, that means that when gas/diesel prices go up, everything gets more expensive... including ICE and EV personal vehicles.

Currently, generally, EVs (and Hybrids) are already 20% to 30% more expensive than their ICE counterparts, even after subsidies/rebates, and are only less expensive than the ICE counterpart in a long run of 10+ years due to lower ongoing fuel costs...

But if gas/diesel prices significantly rise and never go back down...

All vehicles become more expensive.

If ICE vehicle ongoing fuel costs are now so high that an average person can't afford them...

The only other choice is EVs ... but those now have a stupendous sticker price.

So you end up with even less people being able to afford any vehicle whatsoever, but a society that is physically designed to... require one.

So then you end up with a society of an upper class of EV owners, and everyone else who used to be able to afford a midrange ICE car now having to use ICE/EV motorcycles or EBikes... for daily commutes, in all weather.

No more AC or Heating for your completely environmentally exposed 30 minute to 2hr commute to work through a heatwave or heavy snow or rain.

They'd have to rent an EV vehicle to do 2 weeks worth of grocery shopping or move any kind of substantial cargo like a bed, or move more than 2 people a considerable distance, start arranging ride shares to and from work in some kind of comfort.

Oh, and a ton of Americans are functionally too obese/unhealthy/injured to be able to actually use a motorcycle or EBike. So just count them out of the workforce if they can't find ride shares I guess.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

git solves this.

i love me some doom pr0n now and again, but it sounds alot like some people are due for some exercise and they'll be just fine. Things might turn out for the better

[–] sp3tr4l 2 points 10 hours ago

... git?

Like... git hub, git commit?

???

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

As they do, they're quickly turning into indicators of privilege. If/when the petro dollar crashes I totally don't expect billy bob that drives his eight cylinder diesel to hold any resentment towards EV drivers when he's stuck paying for something that he can't afford gas for. But hey what do I know I prefer old school bicycles.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If I had more time under my belt I'd probably buy one. The 100k+ pricetag is just too much right now

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

$100k+ in what currency? The base model of the EV I drive is under $45k

[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

U$. The Rivian I want is about $120k

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago

You can’t make a generalizing statement about how EVs are expensive and then say you were talking about one of most expensive models you can buy…