this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2023
436 points (98.7% liked)

You Should Know

33109 readers
482 users here now

YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.

All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.



Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK:

**In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities:

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

Credits

Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Why YSK: Interviewers like to weed out people who have gaps in their employment history for myriad nonsensical reasons. If you remember that this is all just a game to the employer, you can play to win.


Fill the gaps with a story about a failed foray into entrepreneurship in a related field.

I had a massive gap and this worked gangbusters after six months of constant rejection. The gap was caused by my mother's health rapidly deteriorating, and my sense of responsibility to care for her - which became a full time job until she passed.

After that, I went through the dehumanizing experience of dozens of interviews where I was asked about the gap. Describing why I took the time out of the workforce was hard enough - adding insult to injury was the homogenous reactions among all interviewers. You could watch them mentally write me off in real time, and then go through the motions before sending me off to wait for a "the organization has interviewed several great candidates" email.

It occurred to me that instead of baring my pain for callous interviewers, what they'd rather hear about was a "go-getter" whose spirit has been broken enough to come crawling back to the rat race. So I concocted a story about a failed attempt at being an entrepreneur in their industry.

Lo, and behold - After I stopped telling the truth and started telling people about Vandelay Industries` mighty struggle to remain solvent due to market forces, I found myself with three offers in the same number of weeks.

The difference in interviewers` whole demeanor between "took care of dying mother," and "had to see if I could get Vandelay Industries off the ground while I was young enough to be able to recover from a failure" was night and day.

Read about failed startups. Rehearse.

Everybody lies in the corpo-world. Lie better.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Nah, no "gaps" need to be explained at all. What even is a gap? It takes easily from weeks to months and even years sometimes to find employment and that's not something for the worker to grovel for.

5-year break from working? That can even be a life goal and not a gap.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the real reason employers don't want people with large gaps is because they don't want people who can afford to take that much time off. It scares them knowing that their threats of termination aren't going to work.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Maybe not so much "can afford", but "are willing to".

For all we know OP was living in abject poverty while taking care of their mum, but still making that choice. In that scenario, they couldn't afford, but still did.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Appreciate your idealism, but this is the ugly new reality in the US if you're not adequately situated to tell them to pound sand.

There are very few people in that position, and they gotta eat. The economy is bad, but it's trending toward perpetual dogshit for an overwhelming majority.

The bigger the company, the more I find that they rely on desperation to keep costs low because they can take it a bit further than they used to.

Believe me.. I once had the opportunity to take a year off. It was glorious, and I'lL f'N dO iT aGaIn.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

yes but sometimes they're trying to find people who fit a preconceived notion of "who they want to work with." They may use phrases like "team player" or whatnot. They want someone who is like them. I mean, I can understand the motivation behind that approach but I don't think it's the best way forward.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

yeah they want someone who is like them, and i am definetly not like this. so it is very good to receive a "No" from this type of workplace

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah I think that's true as well. I don't want to make broad statements because situations vary; is it better to try to fake the fit into those jobs OR are people better off skipping and moving to the next lead.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

aye, there's the rub.
I've adopted the Sour Grapes philosophy over the past few years : if they didn't want to hire me then they're obviously a bunch of stupid fucks who don't know quality when they see it, which means I wouldn't want to work with them in the first place. but I say that from a position of already having a job. That philosophy doesn't help someone trying to find a first job or trying to get back into the workforce after an extended absence.