this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
717 points (93.6% liked)

World News

32315 readers
546 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago (13 children)

So you'd be okay with the Chinese dropping a bomb on a house in your neighbourhood because some right-wing nut was gonna blow up a government building?

He's a terrorist, so it's all good right?

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children)

I'm not justifying it. I'm only saying the title is a bit misleading/sensationalist.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

At this point you really need to define what a "war" is because all you're doing is dancing around without having to actually stake any claim to an argument. Instead of getting indignant at people drawing conclusions from what you DO say, make the substance of your opinion known so it can be examined and criticized openly.

Explain what the difference is between having your military attack another country and a "congress didn't say it's a war but it's really a war".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

At this point you really need to define what a “war” is

"a state of armed conflict between different nations or states or different groups within a nation or state"

Key word, "between." You can't have a war if no one declares war.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You can't have a war if no one declares war

Are you just fucking with us now? Is this a bit?

I've seen at least one other person gently remind you of the last 70 years of US history. Are you just being a troll at this point?

I worded my question explicitly so as to make you think about this. Can you please try to?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)