this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
12 points (87.5% liked)

Electric Vehicles

3108 readers
270 users here now

A community for the sharing of links, news, and discussion related to Electric Vehicles.

Rules

  1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No self-promotion
  4. No irrelevant content. All posts must be relevant and related to plug-in electric vehicles — BEVs or PHEVs.
  5. No trolling
  6. Policy, not politics. Submissions and comments about effective policymaking are allowed and encouraged in the community, however conversations and submissions about parties, politicians, and those devolving into general tribalism will be removed.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
12
Tesla launches new 'universal wall connector' that puts the charging world on notice (electrek.co)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Tesla has launched a product: the Tesla Universal Wall Connector. The product is perfect for non-Tesla EV buyers in North America.

The product is inspired by Tesla’s Magic Dock, a new adapter integrated into Supercharger stations. The Magic Dock serves as the receptor for the Supercharger handle, but when unlocked by a non-Tesla EV owner, it sticks to the connector, gets out of the charging stall, and acts as a CCS adapter.

Now Tesla is doing the same thing, but for home charging and commercial level 2 charging.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why is the US hesitant to just legally mandate a specific charger like is done in Europe and Oceania with CCS2? I suppose this does help a little bit to remedy the bizarre charging landscape there, though I can't help but wonder if this whole thing could've been avoided...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The CCS system for the US was finalized well after Tesla had a lot of cars on the road, and is pretty inferior to Tesla's NACS and CCS2. It's not a direct comparison to what happened in the EU.

Maybe they were worried about forcing an inferior standard too soon, and wanted to see how the market would play out?

Do you want to be in a lawsuit over standards with, at the time your only 100% EV car manufacturer, and only manufacturer that even thinks its possible to do 100% EVs, over an inferior standard that early on?

The GOP talks nonstop about not doing stuff like that, and the DEMs would be fighting against the only auto manufacturer company fighting climate change and pushing things forward.

The longer the other OEMs dragged their feet, and the more cars Tesla pumped out using NACS probably made the fight harder and harder to have.

Maybe if they did though, they could have pushed Telsa to open theirs much sooner as well though?

It looks like it's happening on its own now as everyone now moves to NACS but ya, it would have been nicer sooner.

Edit: maybe even just talking about forcing a standard could have convinced Tesla to do this sooner as well?