Comradeship // Freechat

2166 readers

27 users here now

Talk about whatever, respecting the rules established by Lemmygrad. Failing to comply with the rules will grant you a few warnings, insisting on breaking them will grant you a beautiful shiny banwall.

A community for comrades to chat and talk about whatever doesn't fit other communities

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

What are your thoughts on AI Art? (lemmygrad.ml)

submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

20 comments fedilink hide all child comments

As an artist, I think it is a net negative for us. Disregarding the copyright issue, I think it's also consolidating power into large corporations, going to kill learning fundamental skills (rip next generation of artists), and turn the profession into a low skill minimum wage job. Artists that spent years learning and perfecting their skills will be worth nothing and I think it's a pretty depressing future for us. Anways thoughts?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I think it's a typical case of automation, just in the field which was not even imagined to be possible by most people. If anything, it should be a impulse for artists to realize they are not some bourgeoisie freelancers or whatever, not safe from capitalism, but the proletarians they always were.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

In particular, I think the problem is not the technology itself(it rarely is; in my opinion, it is always the application of the technology), in the same sense that advances in automation of production are. The problem is capitalism - under capitalism, automation causes people to lose their jobs and thus their livelihoods, and under socialism, automation decreases the amount of work humans must do and instead leaves them able to explore other hobbies that are not tied to their livelihoods.

There are certainly actual applications of AI art technology that are interesting and/or could be useful, and I think turning it into just a question of "AI art good/bad" is not a particularly insightful question and one that does not really get to the root of the problems with AI art.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yes of course, in socialism art was heavily supported by state - in such situation AI wouldn't be problematic at all, it would be just making art more accessible to masses who lack talent, persistence and free time for it.

Actually, it will do exactly the same in capitalism, most probably even more since capitalism is gating art anyway, but also with more casualties along the way.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

This is similar to what I understand. Artists used to think they were this royalty of society, one of the courtiers of kings or whatever, and when kingdoms ceased to exist, they started to think they all can become Picassos with ruling as capitalist class. Nope, this is the reality.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

I don't understand why people hate artists so much. Do you honestly want to live in a world without artists? Is that what you are alluding to?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Also interesting their arguments are literally identical like some of those used 200 years ago by the artisan guilds. Back then capitalism socialised production. Right now capitalism is socialising art.