this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
23 points (75.6% liked)
Asklemmy
43336 readers
943 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy π
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
https://claude.ai/
In my experience its output is of lower quality than chatgpt 4, but may suffice for your needs.
Good luck :)
Unfortunately he might just need to bite the bullet
Total agreement, small scale LLMs are super cool but just don't have as high quality output, if they're good enough for the job, they're perfect.
Iβll second this and also add that itβs ability to allow documents to be uploaded to read and summarize are really good too
I use Claude.ai a lot, and I like it. It can and will gin up a lot of nonsense, on occasion. I've asked it some pointed questions on arcane subjects I know details about, and it's spit out a pack of crap. I always preface my query with a statement asking Claude to admit when it doesn't have a factual answer, rather than making one up out of whole cloth. Seems to work.