Technology

59672 readers

3246 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

2282

Tech's broken promises: Streaming is now just as expensive and confusing as cable. Ubers cost as much as taxis. And the cloud is no longer cheap (www.businessinsider.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

411 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Tech's broken promises: Streaming is now just as expensive and confusing as cable. Ubers cost as much as taxis. And the cloud is no longer cheap::Some tech is getting pricier and looking a lot like the older services it was supposed to beat. From video streaming to ride-hailing and cloud computing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's a case by case thing, but in a lot of cases the cloud is worse than self-run infrastructure from a cost perspective.

But self-hosting has other non-monetary costs such as the organizational complexity of having to have a giant in-house IT department that knows how to build and maintain that infrastructure, when none of it may be deeply related to the core of what the business is about.

Also, the cloud may be able to compete well against self-hosted stacks with your existing IT department across feature sets price wise in an apples-to-apples comparison, but not everyone needs everything the cloud provides. In some cases, it's not even necessary or desired to have everything connected and available on the Internet.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Saying that self hosting has those costs but cloud doesn't is a bit of a misnomer. In a decently run IT environment you still need someone to manage your cloud instances and watch for bad practices. In fact, the guy who does that in the cloud is probably more expensive than the guy who does it in a self hosted situation.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're likely right, but that's the sales pitch. I don't believe it for the most part. I've been at two companies that made a cloud "transition" while I was working there over the last decade and they're always surprised, shocked, and immediately spring into cost cutting measures as soon as they get the bill. (Meanwhile I'm there like "how could they not see this coming?")

Another point worth making is that if you already have an IT department, a software development staff, or software is a large part of your business... development and testing in the cloud have big, big costs versus running a test environment on your own hardware. And you can try to skip it, but enjoy testing the actual system in production because it will not be the same.