this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
277 points (98.6% liked)
World News
32351 readers
379 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
We basically are. The only good news is that young conservatives believe in and want to do something about climate change, so when the current crop of oil-funded deniers die off, we have some hope to limit the damage. That said, I'm seriously considering moving up north away north as far away from the equator as possible, and to an area with fresh water and farmland.
Then buying a gun. Never thought I'd need one after I left the Army, but as things get worse, I suspect that more violence will result due to scarcity and more likely: stress related to perceived scarcity that doesn't exist. It's always the fear that's more dangerous than the reality. We can probably get by with easy to grow, nutrient-dense foods that are boring to eat, like beans. It's the stress of not being able to eat "tasty" food that'll probably get people to snap. Gunfights over steak, etc.
If we're dependent in any way on "the next generation of conservatives" for anything, we should just stop any kind of hoping now.
There is no validity, utility or future for conservatism. We can't address the issues we have in this world till that philosophy is dead and buried.
I love beans.
Don't go too far north or you'll be engulfed in forest fires.
You are spreading disinformation.
Climate change can be significantly reduced or prevented entirely while maintaining or improving the quality of life for everyone except perhaps for the elite.
None of these steps is particularly hard or expensive. Around a trillion (1,000,000,000,000) dollars are invested in fossil fuels annually which is money that could be put to better use right at the outset.
If the economic, political or societal structures we have makes the execution of these changes difficult or impossible, then it falls to us to bring about a change in those structures.
I was once told that anyone who claims that they agree with your idea, but they think it isn’t feasible because “average people wouldn’t accept it” is either astroturfing or ignorant. From the head spinning levels of disinformation in the original post, it’s pretty clear which side you fall on.
No way you were in a combat related occupation and didn't own a personal firearm. If you had a desk job then what was the point of mentioning the Army?
I call bullshit.
edit: It's been over 24 hours and he's done nothing to displace my assumptions. This isn't my first day on the internet.
some pretty insane assumptions there mate
Perhaps, something about it set off my bullshit radar.
I think your radar needs some fine tuning
It's been over 24 hours and he's done nothing to displace my assumptions. This isn't my first day on the internet, I've seen this shit before.