this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2023
827 points (85.7% liked)

Memes

45730 readers
772 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's very far from new, and it has failed entirely to bring about socialism time and time again through history.

You will never achieve socialism if you just passively support the status quo while condemning all forms of AES for not being pure enough.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What I support is workers organising. What I don't support is Stalinist strongmen oppressing workers. Socialism without power of the workers is meaningless and not worth achieving, that's literally the current system. If I wanted capitalism with socialist aesthetics I can just move to China, that already exists. What I want is actual power to the workers and nothing else.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Workers had more power and say in democracy in the USSR then they have ever had in a Western capitalist country, and American police are more brutal, more violent, more repressive, and kill more people than any "strong men" under Stalin. You've consumed too much anti-communist propaganda.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

No, me and my family lived under Soviet rule in an annexed satellite state. Workers had no power here, people who were friendly to high ranking party members had power and if workers did not comply they got sent to slave camps in siberia where they were not likely to return.

I really don't care about the US and it's quite weird how literally everyone who is trying to paint the USSR in a good light says that with no prompting. Like lung cancer is also bad but bringing that up in every single conversation about anything is weird.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

no prompting

My sibling in Christ you mentioned Stalin, a leader of the USSR, and this entire thread is about socialist states

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Was Stalin the president of the US? Is the US the leader of socialism or something? The US has nothing to do with socialism, like I have been part of my local anarchist group for years and no one has ever even mentioned the US.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Are you seriously not aware of what the US has been doing to crush left-wing movements around the world for the last 80 years?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What decade were you born in?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

1993 every time. They always “know” what the USSR was like better than their tankie grandparents

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Yup, it's shocking how consistent it is.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

When and where did you live in a SSR?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Did an AI write this? You didn't actually respond to anything I said.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I clearly did, but by all means, go with "no u" and see how convincing it is.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You attributed some failed strategy to me and then accused me of purity testing states that are only aesthetically socialist. That response had nothing to do with what I said.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You attributed the failed strategy to yourself, and I accused you of it because that's exactly what you were doing. That's a response, to your comment.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As you yourself said: it's untainted by existing practice, there is no existing strategy as in its new. In relation to the numerous failed attempts at socialism through dictatorship it's better to try something new and not keep shooting the working class in the foot.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok, so what is your new strategy then?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Currently our group has been working on raising avereness of unions since there are a lot of white collar workers that aren't a member of any union. We are also trying to popularise the coop business model especially in the public sector. We are also advocating for wealth redistribution reforms. The USSR kinda ruined calling yourself a socialist(And calling yourself a communist here will more likely get you punched here) so a lot of advocacy has been about pushing for socialist ideas with different wording.

For more long term we are hoping to get unions more involved in government and possibly form a worker's party with the union members.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok, that's all well and good, but nothing new, so what's the new strategy you mentioned?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The workers party we are forming will be domocratic with no strongman.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Ok, but what's the new strategy?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hexbear users don't operate in good faith so no point in actually trying to engage them in good faith. They will wear you out if you do.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We engage in good faith only so long as we are met with good faith, if you aren't going to respect us we have no reason to respect you

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well as long as you have a sub dedicated to "dunking on libs" we both know that is not true.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Hey now, the dunk tank is also for chuds

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Just stop being a lib and be a communist. It’s one quick trick hexbears don’t want you to know