this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
44 points (100.0% liked)
Cassette Futurism
2656 readers
291 users here now
Welcome to Cassette Futurism Lemmy and Mbin Community.
A place to share and discuss Cassette Futurism: media where the technology closely matches the computers and technology of the 70s and 80s.
Whether it's bright colors and geometric shapes, the tendency towards stark plainness, or the the lack of powerful computers and cell phones, Cassette Futurism includes: Cassettes, ROM chips, CRT displays, computers reminiscent of microcomputers like the Commodore 64, freestanding hi-fi systems, small LCD displays, and other analog technologies.
See this blog to know more.
Rules
-
- Post must be related to Cassette Futurism.
-
- If you want to repost atleast wait 3 months.
-
- No AI or permabanned.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic-tape_data_storage
https://techxplore.com/news/2020-12-fujifilm-ibm-unveil-terabyte-magnetic.html
But I don't think it is possible to achieve fast random access to different parts of the tape. The workaround would be having a ridiculous amount of RAM to cache loaded data.
I'm incredibly unqualified to even think about how one might get faster random access times but i was imagining sci-fi solutions like looped tape so that you are always at most 1/2 of the tape length away from the point you want to reach, or the tape equivalent of multi actuator hard drives where there's be multiple independent tapes in one cassette in a sort of RAID style thing but maybe instead of (only) striping data could be stored on multiple tapes in different places to always have one tape that is at a position close to the data you want. Or a system where the same tape has multiple read heads applied to it in distant places.
it’s possible there’d be some kind of RAID micro-tape situation where data is stored on many smaller tapes that can all be seeking individually
*edit:
i think out usage patterns would also change… i could imagine a situation where you’re watching a movie, listening to music, etc and your data is redundantly stored say 3 times… a music playlist would seek to a song in the first storage tape, play sequentially, and seek the 2nd storage tape to the next song location
perhaps things like watching UHD movie content would be slower to start (similar kind of situation to downloading the movie from the internet for piracy) but the quality of the movie would be so high because storage density and bandwidth is high
certainly for interactive tasks like editing documents it’d be total ass no matter what, but again maybe we’d get used to “queueing up” tasks, opening more than we need in the background, etc